hai frds iam Bollepalli anu iam providing the hindu editorial page and vocabulary happy reading................
Topic 1:Compassion on death row cases
row convict Mohammed Arif alias Ashfaq, a Pakistani national found guilty of
conspiring to organise the attack on the Red Fort complex in Delhi in 2000, in
which two Army soldiers and a sentry were killed, has been given one more
opportunity of an oral hearing. His lawyers have been allowed by the Supreme
Court to file a fresh petition seeking a review of the death sentence confirmed
by the court in August 2011 so that the matter can be heard once again in open
court. The court has once again demonstrated its inexhaustible capacity to deal with
death penalty cases in a spirit of compassion. A September 2014 Constitution Bench
judgment ruling that a 30-minute oral hearing in open court for every review
petition involving the penalty is a constitutional requirement was not
applicable to Ashfaq, one of the petitioners before it. This was because the
limited oral hearing in death row cases was just an exception to the general
rule that review petitions be decided by circulation of the papers among
judges. The exception was limited to those cases in which both a review
petition and a subsequent curative plea had already been rejected. In
Ashfaq’s case, the court declined to review his sentence in August 2012 and the
curative petition was rejected in January 2014. Chief Justice T.S. Thakur has,
however, decided that he deserves a concession in order that even the slightest
possibility of error may be eliminated, for he was the sole convict who did not
get the benefit of the earlier verdict.
upholding Ashfaq’s death sentence and declining to review it, obviously because
there was no apparent error, is it not mere moral tokenism to afford him another oral hearing?
Howsoever one may answer this question, it cannot be disputed that the Supreme
Court has been dealing with cases culminating in the death penalty in a liberal
spirit in recent years. It has delivered a series of judgments widening
the scope of the clemency jurisdiction. Even when constrained by an earlier
judgment by another five-member Constitution Bench allowing the disposal of
review petitions without an oral hearing, the Bench, in 2014, carved out an
exception for death row cases alone by making oral hearing an integral part of
‘reasonable procedure’. By extending the benefit to Ashaq, a Lashkar-e-Taiba
terrorist found guilty of plotting and facilitating an audacious attack , the court is
enhancing the value of due process. Some critics may question the wisdom of
towards such offenders and not taking a stern stand against all forms of terrorism. This
apparent conflict between the thirst for condign punishment and the twinge of conscience about sending
one to the gallows
will persist as long as the death penalty remains on the statute book. Until it
is well and truly abolished, it is only the court that can humanise the law and
procedure relating to death and mercy.
1.inexhaustible:(of an amount or supply of something)
unable to be used up because existing in abundance.
2.compassion: sympathetic pity and concern for the
sufferings or misfortunes of others.
3.curative:able to cure disease.
4. plea: a request made in an urgent and emotional
5.mere:used to emphasize how small or insignificant
someone or something is.
6. tokenism: the practice of making only a
perfunctory or symbolic effort to do a particular thing, especially by
recruiting a small number of people from under-represented groups in order to
give the appearance of sexual or racial equality within a workforce.
7.widening: make or become wider.
8.clemency: mercy; lenience
9.audacious: showing a willingness to take surprisingly bold
10.magnanimous: generous or forgiving, especially
towards a rival or less powerful person.
11.stern: (of an act or statement) strict and
12.condign: (of punishment or retribution)
appropriate to the crime or wrongdoing; fitting and deserved.
13.twinge: a sudden, sharp localized pain.
14.gallows: a structure, typically of two uprights and a
crosspiece, for the hanging of criminals.
Topic 2: Grim reminder in Charsadda.
attack by terrorists on Bacha KhanUniversity in northwestern Pakistan,
which left at least 21 people dead, raises serious questions about Islamabad’s anti-terror
strategy. The assault demonstrates that despite a year-long enhanced
counterterror offensive by the Army, Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP)
retains the capacity to inflict lethal harm. The attack in Charsadda in Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa province (the old NWFP) comes over a year after the TTP stormed an
Army school in nearby Peshawar,
killing 134 children. That massacre had prompted widespread anger, forcing the
Army to launch a massive crackdown on Pakistani Taliban. Pakistan lifted
a moratorium on executions, detained thousands of suspected Islamist militants,
and stepped up attacks on the TTP. This had fractured the Taliban
organisationally, and there were fewer attacks in big cities last year. But, as
the latest attack shows, the crackdown failed to neutralise the security
challenges the TTP poses to the Pakistani state.
is mainly owing to two reasons. First, Pakistan’s counterterrorism
strategy is heavily reliant on its security establishment. To be sure, the army
plays a vital role in any campaign against terrorist groups, but its focus
would obviously be on the terrorist infrastructure. But Islamabad needs a broader, more comprehensive
strategy to deal with the issue at the grassroots level. It has to identify and
break up local terrorist networks, counter radical ideology, and more
important, take adequate measures to address lawlessness and extreme poverty in
the northwestern mountainous region, a fertile recruiting ground for jihadists.
dual policy towards terrorism is self-defeating. Even as it fights groups such
as the TTP, the Army is deeply involved with the Afghan Taliban, the Haqqani
Network and anti-India terrorist groups such as the Lashkar-e-Taiba. Using
jihadists for strategic gains has been a deliberate strategy for Pakistan’s
military establishment for decades. That strategy has been proven
counterproductive over the years. Unfortunately, Pakistan has continued this double
game for geopolitical gains. Even after the Peshawar attack, the Army’s focus was only on
the TTP factions, while it kept intact its good ties with the Afghan Taliban,
who control huge swathes of territory in the neighbouring country. As a result,
the TTP, even if it is beaten by the Army, can retreat to Afghanistan, regroup there and move back to Pakistan to
carry out strikes. Pakistan
is aware of these fault lines. But it still won’t amend its strategy because it
looks at the Afghan Taliban as a strategic vehicle to expand its interests in South Asia. This dual policy has weakened the fight
against the Taliban in Afghanistan,
while making Pakistan’s
own campaign against extremism ineffective. Thus Pakistan remains caught between its
own growing internal security challenges and a flawed geopolitical strategy.
The way forward for Islamabad
is to come out of this mess and join other regional powers in a consistent
fight against all forms of terrorism.
1.assault:make a physical attack on.
2.inflict: cause (something unpleasant or painful)
to be suffered by someone or something.
3.lethal: very harmful or destructive.
4. moratorium: a legal authorization to debtors to
to need or depend on something or someone in order to be able to do
6.swathes: a row or line of grass, corn, or other crop as it
falls or lies when mown or reaped.